Cooking vs Baking
Jan. 22nd, 2015 08:21 amI had a day off on Monday, so I spent the day baking and brought some of the cookies into work yesterday to test on my co-workers. They're happy guinea pigs when I'm trying out new recipes - these were from a recipe in the Smitten Kitchen book, and they turned out well, although I'll probably take a minute off the cooking time for the next batch to get them perfect.
It got me thinking, because today we started organising our first food day of the year, and the thought of cooking for my co-workers filled me with terror.
I'm a good baker.
I'm not a good cook.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not the world's worst cook. I can cook well enough to feed myself and my diet is tasty and varied, so I'm able to resist the lure of take out a lot of the time. It's just that I don't cook well enough to feed other people. Give me a new recipe, and the odds of me messing it up are still very high. My confidence with cooking meat is spectacularly low, so most of what I make isn't suitable for people who are huge meat lovers (i.e. everyone I work with). And my flavourings are suited to my palate, which usually doesn't match most other people.
Baking, though? I can usually get good results with a new recipe. Stuff I've practised a lot always goes well. I learned to bake bread last year, and most of my bread is now home-made and very good, if I say so myself. I'm confident at producing cakes, cookies, pastries, breads, and anything else covered under 'baking', enough that I'm willing to bring the results into work and let people try things, even new recipes.
Cooking and baking are two different skill-sets, I feel. I've heard it described as baking is chemistry, and cooking is art. It's surprisingly true: getting the right results in baking is all about how ingredients react together. That means going off-piste on a recipe is only doable if you know how baking works - you can't get casual with ingredient amounts in baking because the proportions make such a huge difference in the end result. But if you follow the recipe carefully, the odds are pretty good that you'll get a good result.
Cooking is easier to fudge and mess around with. It's more artistic in the way the food is constructed and depends a lot on the cook's personal taste and flare.
I think that's why baking is where I feel happy. It suits my brain, which always functioned better in science than in art. I can follow a recipe and apply my knowledge of the science behind baking. Cooking doesn't use the same skills and instincts, so I fall down on it. Every time.
Anyone else a good cook and terrible baker, or a good baker and a terrible cook? I can't be the only one!
It got me thinking, because today we started organising our first food day of the year, and the thought of cooking for my co-workers filled me with terror.
I'm a good baker.
I'm not a good cook.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not the world's worst cook. I can cook well enough to feed myself and my diet is tasty and varied, so I'm able to resist the lure of take out a lot of the time. It's just that I don't cook well enough to feed other people. Give me a new recipe, and the odds of me messing it up are still very high. My confidence with cooking meat is spectacularly low, so most of what I make isn't suitable for people who are huge meat lovers (i.e. everyone I work with). And my flavourings are suited to my palate, which usually doesn't match most other people.
Baking, though? I can usually get good results with a new recipe. Stuff I've practised a lot always goes well. I learned to bake bread last year, and most of my bread is now home-made and very good, if I say so myself. I'm confident at producing cakes, cookies, pastries, breads, and anything else covered under 'baking', enough that I'm willing to bring the results into work and let people try things, even new recipes.
Cooking and baking are two different skill-sets, I feel. I've heard it described as baking is chemistry, and cooking is art. It's surprisingly true: getting the right results in baking is all about how ingredients react together. That means going off-piste on a recipe is only doable if you know how baking works - you can't get casual with ingredient amounts in baking because the proportions make such a huge difference in the end result. But if you follow the recipe carefully, the odds are pretty good that you'll get a good result.
Cooking is easier to fudge and mess around with. It's more artistic in the way the food is constructed and depends a lot on the cook's personal taste and flare.
I think that's why baking is where I feel happy. It suits my brain, which always functioned better in science than in art. I can follow a recipe and apply my knowledge of the science behind baking. Cooking doesn't use the same skills and instincts, so I fall down on it. Every time.
Anyone else a good cook and terrible baker, or a good baker and a terrible cook? I can't be the only one!