Sex scenes and Thai food
Jun. 22nd, 2004 05:45 pmWhen I started writing fanfic, back in the days of writing Buffy/Giles, I had this assumption that all relationship fic had to include sex. I have no idea why. That's why my early stuff had a lot more (badly written) sex in it than my more recent stuff. Nowadays, I'm more confident about my writing and will freely admit that most of my stories work better without the sex. In fact, I'm perfectly happy to write fade-to-black, despite the 'aargh, how could you end it there?' comments I sometimes get (no,
Some of the hottest, sexiest fic that I've read has faded to black instead of writing a blow-by-blow account of the sex and (after cooling down) I know that the story was so good because of that tension throughout it. I've also read incredibly hot fic that just brushed along the edges of the sex without describing every movement and sound - it was the emotions, feelings and hints that made it so damn hot. The thing is that I still see people apologising for leaving out the sex or complaining about the fade to black in a fabulous story, not getting the fact that the story could have been ruined by poorly written sex. How many times have you skipped over the sex scenes because they're samey, dull or out of place?
Why do so many of my posts lately seem to end up as thinly (or not at all) disguised rants?
In other news, I actually did a lot of work on relational databases college work, which means that I feel slightly less guilty about goofing off yesterday. Yay me. I also discovered that I'm going out for a friend's birthday to my favourite restaurant tomorrow. I was also there on Friday, but I couldn't care less because it is yummy Thai food and I rarely get to have yummy Thai food. In fact, Friday was the first time this year that I've had yummy Thai food. I'm getting hungry just thinking about it ::drool::
no subject
Date: 2004-06-24 12:49 pm (UTC)I think a lot of perception probably depends on which archives you're frequenting, which mailing lists you're on and what kind of fanfic you search out - there's probably a huge difference in perception between gen, slash and het fans. Maybe. NC-17 is probably in the minority in some groups, but the dark corners of fandom that I lurked in gave me the impression that most people were looking for NC-17.
The lower rated the slash, the better it's likely to be.
I think a lot comes from my perceptions of the way I rank things :-) If a story has a touch or a kiss or a slightly sexual thought, it automatically gets ramped up to PG. I think I've only got one G rated fic and I remember being uncertain about whether I should have given it a PG. I'm either prudish or very wary of young 'uns accidentally stumbling into territory they're not prepared for. Anything beyond minor hints of touch-kiss-thought territory (er, so most of my stuff) goes to PG-13. That's across the board, though - I don't differenciate between slash or het when I'm rating my work. I even ramped up the rating on Lean On Me because of the (fade to black) scenes of torture that were no worse than we saw on Abyss.
I'm just too careful with my own rating. It means, though, that when I'm looking at fics I tend to find it hard to believe that G-rated fic can actually be slash and I have to really be talked into attempting it. PG and above I have no problem with, but G is unlikely to catch my attention unless I know the author.
Perhaps because I'm coming at it from the opposite end (an NC-17 fic has to sound really good for me to consider reading it) but does anyone know why people think that?
You've got me stumped, there. I can't understand the attitude either. I'm an equal opportunities person and wouldn't dismiss an enourmous chunk of fanfic just because the rating is too low. I may have to think about a G fic before I'll read it, but rating is not the first thing I check before reading a fic. It's usually the last thing and that's only so that I'll know whether the plot or the sex is going to get top priority :-)